The Revay Report

For download purposes, click on the volume of interest listed below.

Vol. 34, No. 1March 2019Demystifying Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Construction
Vol. 33, No. 2April 2018Documenting, Preparing and Settling Claims: Practical Considerations for Contractors
Vol. 33, No. 1January 2018A Contractor’s Guide to Managing Design Risk
Vol. 32, No. 2July 2015Construction Bidding and Tendering: Principles and Practice
Vol. 32, No. 1March 2015Quantification of Construction Claims
Vol. 31, No. 1September 2014A Performance-Based Solution to Avoid Schedule Failure on Construction Projects
Vol. 30, No. 1January 2012The What and Why of Project Documentation
Vol. 29, No. 3November 2010
Quality in Execution of Building Projects.
Vol. 29, No. 2June 2010It's Time for More DRBs in Canada.
Vol. 29, No. 1March 2010The Pitfalls of Incomplete Contract Documents.
Vol. 28, No. 1August 2009
Best Practices for Managing Construction Projects in Good Times and Bad.
Vol. 27, No. 2August 2008
Limitation of Liability Clauses: Manufacturers, Sellers and Contractors Beware.
Vol. 27, No. 1April 2008
Project Performance Reviews
How Owners Can Expand The “Value-For-Money Concept
Vol. 26, No. 2October 2007
Alliances – Fresh Thinking in Contracting Strategy.
Vol. 26, No. 1May 2007The Cumulative Effects of Change Orders.
Vol. 25, No. 2June 2006Expert Evidence.
Vol. 25, No. 1February 2006The viability of a construction project can be measured and monitored.
Revay and Associates Limited is pleased to announce the stability index project evaluation services.
The stability model method or risk management and early prediction of project performance.
Vol. 24, No. 2September 2005Revay and Associates Limited is pleased to announce the introduction of Project Alignment Services Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance and Success.
Vol. 24, No. 1April 200535 Years Of Service To The Construction.
E-mail: An Emerging Risk In Construction.
Vol. 23, No. 3December 2004Stephen G. Revay 1924 – 2004.
Managing Contract Changes.
Vol. 23, No. 2September 2004Opting Out.
Vol. 23, No. 1March 2004Facilitating The Construction Dispute Process.
Vol. 22, No. 2June 2003Contractor’s Head Office Overhead – What is the Right Formula?
Vol. 22, No. 1March 2003If Time is Always of the Essence, Where does that Leave Schedules?
Vol. 21, No. 3November 2002Negotiating Claims and Change Orders.
Vol. 21, No. 2September 2002Coping with Extras.
“The dean of dispute resolution” in Toronto Construction News July 2002.
Vol. 21, No. 1February 2002Managing Project Risk and Conflict: A Project Lawyers’ “Front-End” Perspective
Vol. 21, No. 1 - AppendixFebruary 2002Appendix
Vol. 20, No. 3November 2001Calculating Loss of Productivity Due to Overtime Using Published Charts – Facts or Fiction.
Vol. 20, No. 2June 2001Concurrent Delay: A Modest Proposal.
Vol. 20, No. 1February 2001The DOT-COM Invasion.
Vol. 19, No. 3October 2000Scheduling and Monitoring for Successful Projects.
Vol. 19, No. 2May 2000Monitoring Job-Site Productivity.
Vol. 19, No. 1January 2000Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Handling Construction Disputes.
Vol. 18, No. 3October 1999Learning Curve in Construction.
Vol. 18, No. 2May 1999Construction and Bonds.
Vol. 18, No. 1February 1999Construction Risk.
Vol. 17, No. 3October 1998The Changing Face of Construction.
Vol. 17, No. 2May 1998Construction Disputes: Where are we heading?
Vol. 17, No. 1January 1998What does the Future Hold for Project Management?
Vol. 16, No. 3October 1997Subcontractor’s Claims Against Owners.
Vol. 16, No. 2April 1997Changes in Design/Build Contracts.
Vol. 16, No. 1February 1997The “Underground” Construction Economy – A New Factor in Risk Management.
Vol. 15, No. 3October 1996The Ron Engineering Decision: Fifteen Years Old and Still Immature.
Vol. 15, No. 2June 1996Construction Documentation Using Digital Images.
Documentation control in the Construction Industry.
Application of Computer Databases in Construction Litigation.
Vol. 15, No. 1February 1996Value for Money – An Integrated Approach.
Vol. 14, No. 3November 1995Litigation Graphics.
Vol. 14, No. 2June 1995Can Construction Disputes be Avoided?
Vol. 14, No. 1March 1995Implementing ISO 9000 In The Construction Industry.
Vol. 13, No. 3December 1994Expert Testimony Must be Limited to Areas Outside Common Knowledge.
Vol. 13, No. 2June 1994Delay Analysis Revisited.
Vol. 13, No. 1March 1994On Site Dispute Resolution.
Vol. 12, No. 2November 1993TQM – An Introduction.
The Concept of TQM.
Avoiding the Courtroom Battle of Experts.
Vol. 12, No. 1July 1993Risk Management in Construction Projects.
QCA Montreal Honours Deserving Firms.
RAL President Stephen G. Revay Recognized with National Stollery Award.
Vol. 11, No. 1November 1992Mediation – A More Palatable Solution.
Vol. 10, No. 2December 1991Canadian Research & Development in Construction: A Question of Survival.
Vol. 10, No. 1January 1991At Our 21st Anniversary.
Quantifying Construction Claims!
Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Vol. 9, No. 1October 1990The Expert’s Role in Construction Litigation.
National Surveys Conducted by RAL.
Vol. 8, No. 1August 1989“Project Management Overview” Solution or Fad?
Vol. 7, No. 1May 1988Delay Analysis – Using the “Snapshot” Technique.
New Unit to Serve Sureties.
Vol. 6, No. 2August 1987The Effect of Change Orders on Productivity.
C.C.I.S. Users’ Need Survey Conducted by RAL.
Vol. 6, No. 1February 1986Construction Management Training – An Industry/Academia Challenge Technological Implications of Major Issues.
Facing the Canadian Construction Industry during the Next Decade.
The B.C. Arbitration Centre Wagner, Daigle, Revay Ltd.
Vol. 5, No. 2September 1986Canada Finally Accepts Arbitration.
Vol. 5, No. 1June 1986The British Influence on International Contracting.
Vol. 4, No. 2December 1985Impact costs – The Validity and Calculation of Cost Related to Reduced Productivity.
RAL Services.
Newfoundland & Labrador Institute of Fisheries & Marine Technology.
Surveys, Surveys….
Cost-Saving Coping with Ottawa.
Vol. 4, No. 1Winter 1985Computers and the Competitive Edge in Construction.
Vol. 3, No. 1Summer 1984Lawsuits in Tort Widen Liability of Designers and Builders.
Vol. 2, No. 2Fall 1982Factors Favouring Arbitration an Overseas Projects.
Vol. 2, No. 1Spring 1982Legal Aspects of Scheduling.
Vol. 1, No. 1Winter 1981Between Ourselves
Study Shows Lower Productivity on Cost Plus/Non-Urban/Large Projects.
Computers in Construction
Providing Contractors with a Co-ordinated Computerized Management Information System
Computerized Litigation Support System Available
Pros and Cons of Arbitration
Is Value Management for You?
Claim Count
Heads PM1